n i g h t i n g a l e s h i r a z / blog
mixer.

december 2017
november 2017
october 2017
september 2017
august 2017
july 2017
june 2017
march 2017
february 2017
january 2017
november 2016
october 2016
september 2016
august 2016
july 2016
june 2016
may 2016
april 2016
march 2016
february 2016
december 2015
november 2015
october 2015
september 2015
may 2015
march 2015
february 2015
january 2015
december 2014
november 2014
october 2014
september 2014
august 2014
may 2014
april 2014
march 2014
february 2014
*april 2013
*march 2013
*february 2013
*january 2013
*december 2012
*november 2012
*october 2012
*september 2012
*july 2012
*october 2011
*september 2011
*august 2011
*july 2011
*june 2011
*may 2011
april 2011
march 2011
april 2010
march 2010
february 2010
january 2010
december 2009
november 2009
september 2009
june 2009
may 2009
february 2009
january 2009
december 2008
october 2008
september 2008
august 2008
july 2008
june 2008
may 2008
april 2008
january 2008
december 2007
november 2007
october 2007
september 2007
august 2007
july 2007
june 2007
may 2007
april 2007
march 2007
february 2007
january 2007
december 2006
november 2006
october 2006
september 2006
august 2006
july 2006
june 2006
may 2006
april 2006
march 2006
february 2006
january 2006
december 2005
november 2005
october 2005
september 2005
august 2005
july 2005
june 2005
may 2005
april 2005
march 2005
february 2005
january 2005
december 2004
november 2004
october 2004
september 2004
august 2004
july 2004
june 2004
may 2004
april 2004
march 2004
february 2004
january 2004
december 2003
june 2003
april 2003
march 2003
 
explaining usability to your mother.

i know it's almost a month since World Usability day 2006.  but i just found the promo posters for the event (having been buried under a mountain of content and information architecture myself, SPEAKING of usability...) -- and i think they're great.

if you -- like me -- are finding this field even harder to explain to people (via the "so what do you do" question) than any you've ever worked in (who would have thought i'd be doing something that was even harder to explain than technology -- ha! -- technology seems as comprehensible to the common man as carpentry now...) -- then maybe you should paste these to the backs of a few business cards.

of course, it might not change anything at all.  your mother might still go around telling people that her daughter "she uh, works with computers...".

exactly.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Rue Saint-Alexandre, Montréal]
[wednesday 13 december 2006 at 12:09:48] []

what happens when you Russian-roulette your way into random IT journalism...

...specifically, in relation to today's Edvard Munch tribute on Google, and me being naive enough to pick the first result in the related "Happy Birthday Edvard Munch" result list...

you get -- well.  see for yourself (it will take you all of seven seconds to read, though comprehension is another matter altogether).  quite a bit of smoke and disconnected writing for so scant a bunch of lines...

what was this writer doing, blogging from her carphone?  where is the concept of narrative?  of a point, towards which (or around which), you tell a story, or consider an issue, or present an argument?  where (for the love of God) -- is any idea of a purpose -- to inform, inspire or incite?  (my inner Alliteration Assistant suggests the word "irritate"...)
and where's that other concept -- the one about one sentence having something (maybe.  sometimes.  ooh -- how about just once?) to do with the next?

to say a schizophrenic wrote this is unfair (and i'm pretty sure it's clear to whom).  it just looks like she took all her scribble notes from a stackful of post-its, and let fly.  or, like she needed to blog and quick (and she needed to make it survey-worthy -- note the "Promo Verdict" vote buttons at the bottom of the -- cough -- article), and she opened up a browser for instant inspiration, and uh, decided to stop right there.

i'm sorry.  i know i'm no Pulitzer-pen-pusher myself.  and i know the Internet (Web 2.0, whatever) is all about fast-paced, often-instant, user-generated content.  but come on.  this just makes me annoyed.  and maybe i should be -- except with myself.  for trusting Google's auto-search to tell me something halfway-intelligent about the Munch doodle on it's own home page...

judging from some of the actual comments on a higher level page, it seems i'm not alone in this frustration.  my favorite is the super-simple: "*This* is what you blog about?"

"Capitalizing on Interactivity, Mobility and Personalization".
indeed.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Rue Saint-Alexandre, Montréal]
[tuesday 12 december 2006 at 16:50:28] []

offering.

i know.  i need to write about what crossing the border on a Greyhound bus is (still) like.  i need to write about the Gilbane Conference on Content Management.  i need to write about what it felt like to sit on a bar stool at Spring and Wooster, again.  i need to write about the Boomerang Awards (or maybe i don't).

but until then, there's real writing to be read.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Avenue Girouard, Montréal]
[saturday 09 december 2006 at 14:45:19] []

on being in good company.

it says a lot about me, that i can't decide who i'm more excited to be sharing the home page with: Matt Dillon, or Calvino.

thank goodness for screenshots.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Avenue Girouard, Montréal]
[sunday 03 december 2006 at 20:54:12] []