n i g h t i n g a l e s h i r a z / blog
O Solo Waiting

june 2023
january 2023
december 2022
september 2022
august 2022
july 2022
january 2022
november 2021
october 2021
september 2021
august 2021
july 2021
june 2021
may 2021
april 2021
march 2021
february 2021
january 2021
september 2020
august 2020
july 2020
may 2020
april 2020
march 2020
february 2020
december 2019
october 2019
july 2019
june 2019
may 2019
april 2019
march 2019
february 2019
january 2019
december 2018
november 2018
october 2018
september 2018
august 2018
july 2018
june 2018
may 2018
april 2018
march 2018
february 2018
january 2018
december 2017
november 2017
october 2017
september 2017
august 2017
july 2017
june 2017
march 2017
february 2017
january 2017
november 2016
october 2016
september 2016
august 2016
july 2016
june 2016
may 2016
april 2016
march 2016
february 2016
december 2015
november 2015
october 2015
september 2015
may 2015
march 2015
february 2015
january 2015
december 2014
november 2014
october 2014
september 2014
august 2014
may 2014
april 2014
march 2014
february 2014
*april 2013
*march 2013
*february 2013
*january 2013
*december 2012
*november 2012
*october 2012
*september 2012
*july 2012
*october 2011
*september 2011
*august 2011
*july 2011
*june 2011
*may 2011
april 2011
march 2011
april 2010
march 2010
february 2010
january 2010
december 2009
november 2009
september 2009
june 2009
may 2009
february 2009
january 2009
december 2008
october 2008
september 2008
august 2008
july 2008
june 2008
may 2008
april 2008
january 2008
december 2007
november 2007
october 2007
september 2007
august 2007
july 2007
june 2007
may 2007
april 2007
march 2007
february 2007
january 2007
december 2006
november 2006
october 2006
september 2006
august 2006
july 2006
june 2006
may 2006
april 2006
march 2006
february 2006
january 2006
december 2005
november 2005
october 2005
september 2005
august 2005
july 2005
june 2005
may 2005
april 2005
march 2005
february 2005
january 2005
december 2004
november 2004
october 2004
september 2004
august 2004
july 2004
june 2004
may 2004
april 2004
march 2004
february 2004
january 2004
december 2003
june 2003
april 2003
march 2003
 
froth

is there a way i can filter my Facebook newsfeed, so i don’t have to see when people post "Likes" to grammatically incorrect and/or logically flawed accolades to a certain religion, in a week when so-called, self-proclaimed members of this religion have just put a bullet in the head of a F O U R T E E N year old girl -- and then said (via their *official* spokesman), that yes, she "had been the target," and that her "crusade for education rights" was an "obscenity," and that if she survived, they would certainly try to kill her again ("Let this be a lesson.").

in a week when they have done this, you can hit "like" on some pastel-pink postcard that suggests that the most important thing to ask a man when he comes for your daughter’s hand is "how close" he is to your god?

I'm looking at you, Ameena Baji...

well. in that case. that official spokespan who thinks little girls who want to go to school should be shot in the head -- it looks like he would pass your test pretty well, wouldn’t he?

who are these people who can be so blissfully blinkered, as to think that *that* is not also their religion? that they are not a party -- no matter how removed and how "powerless" (oh please) -- to all those "incorrect interpretations" of the "fundamentalists"? i’m sorry. who are WE? because i say it too -- "this is not our religion" -- "our religion is about peace..." oh yes. except. you know what. if it is about peace. or all these other awesome things that allow us to sleep in our nice, clean beds at night. maybe we need to take a break from clicking "Like" on the cute little pictures in pink cursive script, to do something about the colossal case of brand confusion that we have here.

dear god how i worry for your daughters.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Via Belvedere, Orte]
[venerdì 12 ottobre 2012 ore 17:50:08] []

Why I love Merriam-Webster Online (this week, anyway)

I look up the word "corral" (because I find that I’m building a rather questionable metaphor with it, and I need to know just how questionable..). I don’t find a straight answer of course (which means that the metaphor remains a little too questionable; I can’t talk about any pastures beyond it; etc.). But I do see that they have this:



How cool is that?

Of course, they also have this:



Pascal? Really? Sigh.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Via Belvedere, Orte]
[giovedì 11 ottobre 2012 ore 13:55:08] []

Small town life

Today my cleaning lady thought it necessary (as she handed me a bunch of leaves she had picked from my garden), to explain what one can do with basil: "Sai, questi vanno con pomodoro, un po’ di aglio, poi si mischia tutto..."

I am both indignant and suddenly insecure: Do I come across as someone who does not know what to do with basil...? Because that would be a problem.

Yesterday it was Maria-Antonietta the Crazed Curtain Woman who messed with my inner peace. I am walking back up the hill from the post office (thank you, Webank, for sending my new bancomat so promptly), and enjoying the afternoon sun, when I hear frantic honking, and then a car screeches to a halt beside me, and Maria-Antonietta leans over to speed-scream at me in her Let’s-See-How-Many-Times-I-Can-Interrupt-You-Per-Second, Loose-n-Lazio Italian. Then she drives off again mid-sentence (my mid-sentence, and hers).

For some reason, I think of my mother’s driver in Karachi, with his four good shirts (before we gave him some of my father’s...) and his paan-stained teeth and his way of not looking you in the eye, ever. He has more class than this woman.

Then I feel bad -- how can I make such an insulting comparison? Juma’s too good to be in the same paragraph with that nut-job.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Via Belvedere, Orte]
[martedì 09 ottobre 2012 ore 12:55:08] []

Half the battle

More passive-aggressive messaging at my other-half, today courtesy of The Essential Marcus Aurelius:

6.19 - If something is difficult for you to accomplish, do not then think it impossible for any human being: rather, if it is humanly possible and corresponds to human nature, know that it is attainable by you as well.

6.21 - If someone is able to show me that what I think or do is not right, I will happily change, for I seek the truth, by which no one was ever truly harmed. Harmed is the person who continues in his self-deception and ignorance.

Word.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Via Belvedere, Orte]
[venerdì 05 ottobre 2012 ore 17:04:08] []

Parched

At Ai Tre Scalini, a couple sits down -- after a charming three minutes in which the girl, brown-haired and worry-faced, confesses: "We have not reserved, we have not reserved..." Simone tells her it’s alright. Her accent seems, well, accented. She circles her mouth around vowels the way Claudia Cardinale would, like she’s in a land that isn’t her own.

They sit down; they are each given a menu. He asks immediately, naturally, he is still looking at his menu but it is like breathing, an awareness: what would you like to drink.

What would you like.

What would I like?
I would like for you to ask me, what I would like.
No.
Wait.
I would like for you
to want to know.
More.
Or less.
I would like for you to be
aware
that you might not.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Via Belvedere, Orte]
[giovedì 04 ottobre 2012 ore 18:54:08] []

Morepoetry, morepoetry!

In what I like to call the Kakapo Chapter (also known as "Heartbeats in the Night") of Last Chance to See, Douglas Adams has this wonderful line (among a gazillion) about a certain kind of owl that is native to New Zealand: One night we saw a morepork, which is a type of owl that got its name from its habit of continually calling for additional pigflesh. He doesn’t say if he actually heard the morepork. I suspect that if he had, he would have commented (in that Awesome Adams Way) about how it doesn’t sound like it’s saying "more pork" at all, and how it’s quite likely that the person who first decided to call it a morepork was probably delusionally hungry at the time.

Last week’s post was about poetry, and today I find that I have more. So this post is dedicated to that fabulous, now-extinct ancestor of the morepork* -- the morepoetry.

*Also known as the ruru, the boobook and the Southern Boobook -- this bird has literature in its blood yo!

Anyway. For class this week (the one I take, not the one I teach -- sigh...), we had to read "The Glass Essay" by Anne Carson (in her book Glass, Irony and God), and I found that I didn’t like most of it. It’s not because it was poetry (and I *did* think it was poetry -- despite a classmate’s skepticism -- but I’ll harrumph about that properly another day...) -- I find that I can love lots of kinds of poetry -- the kind that ryhmes, the kind that doesn’t, lyric, narrative, etc. (any kind of poetry as long as it’s not *my* poetry...). But this felt a little too wispy and ethereal and diaphanous for me. Still, I liked the parts where she has more of the concrete than the abstract (like the toast-talk with her mother; like the moment where she goes from arguing about swimsuits and rape to understanding -- "the frail fact drops on me from a great height" -- that her mother is afraid for her; like the first phonecall in which she finds her father quicksinking into dementia -- "I heard his sentences filling up with fear"...). So I went looking online to see what else I could find of the more concrete Ms Carson...



I’ve embedded the whole video, but be warned -- it’s 42 minutes long (good for a train ride, good for wallpapering your personal headspace in the subway, and -- if you’re a weirdo like me -- good for a couple of sessions on the elliptical). The first thing she reads is her Essay on What I Think About Most, which starts the way everyone should start everything:

Error.
And its emotions.
On the brink of error is a condition of fear.
In the midst of error is a state of folly and defeat.
Realizing you’ve made an error brings shame and remorse.
Or does it?

Let’s look into this.
Lots of people including Aristotle think error
an interesting and valuable mental event.
In his discussion of metaphor in the Rhetoric
Aristotle says there are 3 kinds of words.
Strange, ordinary and metaphorical.

"Strange words simply puzzle us;
ordinary words convey what we know already;
it is from metaphor that we can get hold of something new & fresh"
(Rhetoric, 1410b10-13).
In what does the freshness of metaphor consist?
Aristotle says that metaphor causes the mind to experience itself

in the act of making a mistake.
He pictures the mind moving along the plane surface
of ordinary language
when suddenly
that surface breaks or complicates.
Unexpectedness emerges.

At first it looks odd, contradictory, or wrong.
Then it makes sense.
And at this moment, according to Aristotle,
the mind turns to itself and says:
"How true, and yet, I mistook it!"
From the true mistakes of metaphor a lesson can be learned.

Not only that things are other than they seem,
and so we mistake them,
but that such mistakenness is valuable.
Hold on to it, Aristotle says,
there is much to be seen and felt here.
Metaphors teach the mind

to enjoy error
and to learn
from the juxtaposition of what is and what is not the case.
There is a Chinese proverb that says,
Brush cannot write two characters with the same stroke.
And yet

that is exactly what a good mistake does.

I love the idea that "metaphor causes the mind to experience itself in the act of making a mistake." I love the idea of "the mind moving along the plane surface of ordinary language" and of how, "suddenly that surface breaks or complicates" -- how "unexpectedness emerges." I love the idea that -- the *fact* that -- "mistakenness is valuable."


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Via Belvedere, Orte]
[martedì 02 ottobre 2012 ore 10:41:08] []