n i g h t i n g a l e s h i r a z / blog
La Venere di #Blub in versione tedesca in onore del nuovo direttore degli Uffizi.

may 2019
april 2019
march 2019
february 2019
january 2019
december 2018
november 2018
october 2018
september 2018
august 2018
july 2018
june 2018
may 2018
april 2018
march 2018
february 2018
january 2018
december 2017
november 2017
october 2017
september 2017
august 2017
july 2017
june 2017
march 2017
february 2017
january 2017
november 2016
october 2016
september 2016
august 2016
july 2016
june 2016
may 2016
april 2016
march 2016
february 2016
december 2015
november 2015
october 2015
september 2015
may 2015
march 2015
february 2015
january 2015
december 2014
november 2014
october 2014
september 2014
august 2014
may 2014
april 2014
march 2014
february 2014
*april 2013
*march 2013
*february 2013
*january 2013
*december 2012
*november 2012
*october 2012
*september 2012
*july 2012
*october 2011
*september 2011
*august 2011
*july 2011
*june 2011
*may 2011
april 2011
march 2011
april 2010
march 2010
february 2010
january 2010
december 2009
november 2009
september 2009
june 2009
may 2009
february 2009
january 2009
december 2008
october 2008
september 2008
august 2008
july 2008
june 2008
may 2008
april 2008
january 2008
december 2007
november 2007
october 2007
september 2007
august 2007
july 2007
june 2007
may 2007
april 2007
march 2007
february 2007
january 2007
december 2006
november 2006
october 2006
september 2006
august 2006
july 2006
june 2006
may 2006
april 2006
march 2006
february 2006
january 2006
december 2005
november 2005
october 2005
september 2005
august 2005
july 2005
june 2005
may 2005
april 2005
march 2005
february 2005
january 2005
december 2004
november 2004
october 2004
september 2004
august 2004
july 2004
june 2004
may 2004
april 2004
march 2004
february 2004
january 2004
december 2003
june 2003
april 2003
march 2003
 
What Keeps Us

This week there has been lots of work-related “hurry-up-and-wait.”  And so, in among the waitey bits, I let myself read an essay from this month’s issue of Poetry Magazine.  The essay is titled “The Aesthetics of Silence: Prison, Rehabilitation, and Poetry.”

In clicking through—and perhaps in part because the writer’s name feels a little like it’s leaning eastward—I think for a moment of another piece I have read recently, that merges something poetic with something imprisoned—dark and broken and glittering at the same time...

Anyway.  This essay, today, is on prison rehabilitation (and what poetry has to do with it).  It begins by mentioning a letter to The Guardian, from a certain Dr Clare Coggins, who is writing in exasperated response to an interview with the author Valeria Luiselli, in which Luiselli refers to literature and art as things that are “questionably useful.”  The essay quotes a part of Coggins’ letter:

I am a doctor; I work in a hospice.  I am painfully aware that science keeps us alive.  But what keeps us living is art.  The overstretched, underfunded NHS still finances an art therapist and a music therapist at my hospice.  When patients need something to keep them going they look to the arts.

*

There’s a spot in our kitchen...  It’s maybe the first place you look, as you walk into our home.  It’s usually the last place I look, as I leave.  It’s a spot of wall-space above the wine-cart where we keep the kinds of things that need to be kept near the door: a set of keys, a letter-opener, and a buono sconto for our next time at Todo-Modo.  From here when you look up, you’ll see a poster of Chagall’s Pair of Lovers and Flowers, from a show of his works (“Love and Life,” 2015) at the Chiostro Bramante in Rome.  Also a very large and delightfully-detailed map of most every vineyard, wine, and/or varietal in Tuscany.  A bookmark-sized print of a detail from Edward Hopper’s Railroad Sunset.  A postcard-flyer for a live reading and re-enactment (with song and accordion) of Boccaccio’s Decameron at Villa Bardini.  And finally, a bookmark featuring a quote (in Italian) from Henry Miller: “L’arte non ci insegna nulla, salvo il significato della vita.”

*

I finish the essay.  It’s alright.  There is at least one difficult question it asks:

During the initial months I found myself confronted with a moral dilemma. Why do men who have hurt, maimed, and ruined the lives of innocent people deserve my time? I wondered if being allowed the amenity to develop your writing should be seen as a privilege, not something readily available in a prison.

And there is a lovely line about art as the final frontierwhere the mind is free to [...] to reckon truly with itself.

But then in the end it peters out, with an almost ridiculously robotic march through the language of anesthetized nothingness:

Many of these men will be released back into the general population.  The skills and apparatus we help establish before release and onward will play a vital role in the likelihood of them reoffending. [...] I like to believe that granting opportunities as precepts in favor of the betterment of people will, in the long run, advantage us all.

I know it’s his way—a kind of a way—to answer that difficult question from earlier.  But still, it leaves me feeling like I’ve swallowed a ball-bearing.  And so maybe just to feel better, I go looking for the rest of that letter, from Dr Coggins to The Guardian.  When I find it, I discover there’s a whole bit the essay didn’t quote, in which I can almost hear the voice of this wonderful Dr Coggins—anguished, angry and thoroughly unanesthetized:

...one minute [Luiselli] makes an admirable case for the value of fiction, and the next she asks, “If you’re going to devote your life to something as questionably useful as literature or art, I think there’s a commitment that you make to understanding others”.  Questionably useful?  I was tearing at the paper in frustration.  Why do we feel that the arts are inferior to science?  Who made us believe that?

It feels like a question to put to some kind of gigantic, collective mirror.  Who indeed?


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Santo Spirito, Firenze]
[domenica 20 maggio 2019 ore 19:06:09] []

Forms of Blindness

A friend posts on Facebook, about how hard it is to present her queerness to the world, and the constant misunderstandings she has to deal with, around her gender.  A friend of hers (or at least, enough of a friend to be a Facebook friend of hers) responds with some thoughts on how we’re all different, odd, or “queer” in some way (his choice of quotes), but that we’re all on the same rock spinning around the sun, and so we should focus on common causes and common ground.

I have the kind of reaction I’ve been having on and off for years now, whenever I hear someone speak of such things.  How we’re all the same, or (if they’re of a religious inclination), how we’re all God’s children.  How there’s no difference between us, or (my personal unfavorite these days), that “I don’t see color.”

*

Since sometime in January of this year, I’ve gotten better at understanding the mechanics of this reaction, and sometimes, better even at engaging with it.  Because some time in January of this year, I read Sister Outsider by Audre Lorde.  And since then I have, if not my own words with which to articulate a response, Lorde’s words.

Here are some of Lorde’s words, on difference:

The need for unity is often misnamed as a need for homogeneity...

...we have been taught either to ignore our differences, or to view them as causes for separation and suspicion rather than as forces for change. Without community there is no liberation, only the most vulnerable and temporary armistice between an individual and her oppression. But community must not mean a shedding of our differences, nor the pathetic pretense that these differences do not exist.

It is not our differences which separate [us], but our reluctance to recognize those differences and to deal effectively with the distortions which have resulted from the ignoring and misnaming of those differences.

Too often, we pour the energy needed for recognizing and exploring difference into pretending those differences are insurmountable barriers, or that they do not exist at all.  This results in a voluntary isolation or false and treacherous connections.  Either way, we do not develop tools for using human difference as a springboard for creative change within our lives.

[F]orms of human blindness stem from the same root — an inability to recognize the notion of difference as a dynamic human force, one which is enriching rather than threatening...

What is she saying?  She’s saying that our differences exist.  Don’t euphemize them away with your talk of the rock and the sun, of God’s children and of sameness.  We are different.  Not less or more important, but different.  The difference matters.

Sometimes, it’s what matters most.


[nightingaleshiraz] [?]
[Santo Spirito, Firenze]
[giovedì 16 maggio 2019 ore 20:53:00] []